Moderator: Moderators
Phlashman wrote:To be fair that was good. Why did they take two seasons to get round to it?
Phlashman wrote:A thrilling episode would be a first for Game of Thrones.
Cheesecake666 wrote:In the book, everything was building up to this moment, you sensed that it was going to be massive. All the schemes Tyrion put into place lead to this. sadly, the show didn't really make this apparant. There was no chain, no training of the archers and catapult users and they didn't make wildfire a big deal before this.
You never really see battles in the books, they are more heard about and you see the repercussions of these fights. Game of Thrones was never about sword fights and epic battles. That's what Lord of the Rings is for. In Thrones, we get complex and brilliant characters and don't get me wrong, I love action as much as the next guy but Game of Thrones is not an action show, it is a drama first and fore-most.
| Share the BXB Love: | Tweet |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users